Call for Abstracts

CALL FOR ABSTRACTS NOW CLOSED


Important Dates:

Acceptance Notification expected on or before Friday, December 13, 2024
Presenter Registration Deadline (also Early Bird deadline): Friday, January 31, 2025


Tracks:

Populations across the globe are experiencing rapid changes due to the economic, digital, cultural, and environmental forces affecting their lives and communities. Such global complexity and diversity, which has been accelerated since COVID-19, present both opportunities (e.g., innovation in communications, improved living standards) and challenges (e.g., environmental degradation, economic inequality, stress, conflict). Health education and promotion is positioned to act on its basic tenets and values of health equity and social justice to advance upstream policies and practices impacting social determinants of health. This conference will address ways that public health education professionals can strengthen their outreach to marginalized and vulnerable populations, address the growing crisis of behavioral and mental health, advance professional preparation and training to work in global health settings, and utilize technological and health communication tools for collective well-being. We encourage abstract submissions that align with the following four categories:

Leadership, Mentoring, and Training the Next Workforce
This track focuses on the critical role that leadership and mentoring plays in shaping the next generation of health education professionals. This track will explore effective strategies and best practices for training and developing emerging talent, fostering a culture of continuous learning, and designing effective mentorship programs that empower individuals to reach their full potential in health education/promotion. Abstracts are encouraged that present innovative approaches for building the health education leadership pipeline and essential competencies for academia, research and practice; ideas for workforce recruitment, diversity, and retention; advocacy skills to address the dynamic political environment; and successful coaching and mentoring programs.

Social Justice and Health Equity
Social justice and health equity are at the core of essential public health services and are foundational principles of the health education profession. The pandemic exposed persistent problems in health disparities and laid bare ways that pervasive racism continues to thwart progress in achieving health equity and social justice for all. This track encourages abstracts that focus on partnerships and collaborations for social justice; new approaches to advocacy and dismantling inequitable policies and structures affecting races, ethnicities, genders, and LBGTQ+ populations; innovative ways for training social justice advocates; and examples of equitable health policies and programs that increase prevention, early detection, and treatment of health issues. Abstracts that address health education and health promotion pedagogy, research and practice in cross-cultural, international, and global environments also are encouraged.

Technology and Communications
Technology and the advent of infodemiology (i.e., study of how digital content and media have impacted the practice of public health, health policymaking, and people’s health behaviors) is driving the practice of health education/health promotion in the 21st century. The widespread use of cell phones, text messaging, mobile apps, websites, and more recently the use of artificial intelligence (AI), and the changing relationship people have with health information and who/what they consider sources of credible and accurate health information, have transformed the training, roles, and practices of health educators and communicators. Health educators, communicators and health workers have also been challenged to develop new skills to cope with and thrive within the digital information environment where their patients and communities also live. This conference track encourages abstracts on the teaching, research and practice of infodemiology, including new skills and competencies needed by health educators to mitigate mis/disinformation wherever it is found and keep pace with rapid technical advances; the impacts and interventions to prevent and mitigate social isolation, loneliness, anxiety and mental health linked to social media; ethical issues within organizational policies and procedures related to AI including issues in health communication; and the impact of health communication and technology on inclusion and equity across populations and strategies to fight mis/disinformation.

Program Planning and Evaluation
Program planning and evaluation are essential pieces of successful public health practice. This track will explore best practices for objective definition, strategic engagement, evidence-based activity selection, intervention sustainability, cross-collaborative communication, and implementation in assessment, planning, and implementation. Abstracts also are encouraged that address evaluation-related strategies, such as stakeholder engagement, evaluation design, qualitative and quantitative reporting methodology, quality improvement, data visualization, and storytelling. Given Long Beach is a hub of creative arts and culture, abstracts are also welcome on integration and impact of art, murals, music, poetry and other forms of human expression in health education pedagogy, research, and practice.


Who should submit abstracts
  • Government relations/advocacy professionals
  • Health education & promotion professionals
  • School health educators/school health education coordinators
  • Behavioral/social scientists
  • Patient educators
  • Education/promotion students
  • Community health & public health education faculty
  • Tribes and Tribal organizations
  • Public health practitioners
  • Mental health professionals
  • Chronic disease directors
  • Dental hygienists/community oral health
  • coordinators
  • Community‐based organizations and staff
  • Grassroots organizers
  • Allied health professionals
  • Social marketers
  • Informatics professionals
  • Health communication professionals
  • Pharmacists
  • Dietitians & nutritionists
  • Health/social policy experts
  • Social workers
  • Health administrators
  • Nurses, nurse midwives & nurse practitioners
  • Clinicians
  • Ethicists
  • Community members
What is SOPHE looking for?

To deliver exceptional learning experiences that include the following:

Rich Content:

  • Reflect innovative, cutting‐edge content, and evidence‐based practice
  • Present a strong case with evidence supported by research or data
  • Explore issues important to diverse audiences and communities
  • Challenge attendees to be solution-focused

Instructional Design:

  • Stimulate and provoke discussion, audience engagement, and outcome‐focused design
  • Facilitate knowledge transfer and encourage application of the HESPA II Areas of Responsibilities and competencies
  • Use methods that draw out relevant past knowledge and experiences

Audience Engagement:

  • Aspiring and emerging leaders through executive‐level, seasoned professionals
  • Inclusive of different types of adult learners (e.g., visual, auditory, and kinesthetic) and taking into consideration personality traits (e.g., introvert, extrovert and ambivert) in various learning styles.
  • Demonstrate relevance of lessons through “real‐life” case studies
Abstract Criteria

Selected through an open call to all SOPHE members and health education professionals, hundreds of volunteers act as peer reviewers anonymously scoring abstracts within their area(s) of expertise. Diverse peer input is important in shaping the conference sessions. Abstract submissions will be reviewed by 3-4 peer-reviewers based on the following criteria:

  • Relationship to conference theme: Does the abstract relate to the theme and the chosen track?
  • Objectives: Are the learning objectives clearly stated as SMART: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-Bound?
  • Originality: Is the abstract original work and hasn’t been presented before?
  • Sound conceptual framework: Does the abstract include a clearly stated background/rationale related to its objectives?
  • Methodology/Description: Is the purpose clearly and concisely described? Is the methodology or practice description clearly stated and appropriate for the research or practice?
  • Innovative and Action-focused: Does the abstract represent usefulness and innovation to the field of health education? Does it inspire action to generate results?
  • Program Design: Is the abstract well‐written and the content is clear? Does it clearly outline what the presentation will be? Is it presented in an organized and structured manner? Don’t underestimate the importance of instructional flow and design. The best learning environments are collaborative and use a solution-based approach to a problem.
  • Free of Commercial Bias: All abstract submissions must be educational in nature, neutral and unbiased. SOPHE policy requires potential presenters to disclose any proprietary, financial, professional, or other personal interests in the material to be presented. Any abstract that is not free of commercial bias will not be accepted. If accepted, those in violation of this policy may forfeit any speaking opportunities.